<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>unixwiz &#187; Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/tag/rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz</link>
	<description>anything dealing with *NIX or what ever I want to write about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Marriott Hotels and Internet Access</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2010/07/01/marriott-hotels-and-internet-access/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2010/07/01/marriott-hotels-and-internet-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hotels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spend a lot of my time away from home in Marriott Hotels around the world. One thing I can never understand is their Internet access policy. I was in Washington DC 2 nights ago staying at one of the upper end Marriott&#8217;s (around $300 a night) I turned on my iPod to see if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spend a lot of my time away from home in Marriott Hotels around the world. One thing I can never understand is their Internet access policy. I was in Washington DC 2 nights ago staying at one of the upper end Marriott&#8217;s (around $300 a night) I turned on my iPod to see if I could get on the Internet to check my mail. To my surprise the Internet cost was I believe $14.95 for a 24 hour period. What I have failed to understand is why is it when staying at say a Courtyard Marriott or a Residence Inn Marriott that the Internet is free, and the room is like $80 to $90 a night. But when I stay at the high end Marriott&#8217;s (Like JW Marriott in Washington DC, or London Park Lane in London, England) that they always charge for Internet access. It was nice to see that the <a href="https://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/waswe-washington-marriott/">Washington Marriott</a> did havt LG HDTV&#8217;s in the room with actual HD TV service, but it would have been nice if the wireless Internet was free as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2010/07/01/marriott-hotels-and-internet-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TiVo and comcast part 2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2010/07/01/tivo-and-comcast-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2010/07/01/tivo-and-comcast-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TiVo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally getting around to writing about the second appointment with Comcast last friday afternoon. This time the Comcast dude called me at about 10 minutes after 2pm to say he was on his way. (Yeah!) So he shows up (real comcast person and not a contractor this time). He also brought 3 cable cards with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally getting around to writing about the second appointment with Comcast last friday afternoon. This time the Comcast dude called me at about 10 minutes after 2pm to say he was on his way. (Yeah!) So he shows up (real comcast person and not a contractor this time). He also brought 3 cable cards with him, thanks to <a href="http://twitter.com/comcaststeve">@comcaststeve</a> for making sure that note was made and for Jason (the comcast tech) for also bringing extra.</p>
<p>The first thing we did was check the current one that was put in almost a week prior. Yup, still not activated. So we pulled it and put a &#8220;new&#8221; one in. Jason called the Comcast office and they &#8220;sent the signal&#8221; well we waited and chatted for a about 30 minutes, and it never got the signal. So another call back and this time a different person. He seemed to think he was &#8220;better&#8221; than the last person and that the last person didn&#8217;t know what they were doing. Well this guy didn&#8217;t either, as the signal he sent to the card was the &#8220;kill one&#8221; which basically inactivated the card. But we did not know this until another 30 minutes past and we called in again because no signal had been received.</p>
<p>So they had us put in the another card and they sent the signal again. Still no go, so they put the final card in. I am not entirely sure what they did on their side, but the card finally said it was activated (the woman on the phone kept talking to some other techs in the back about what to send to it to make it &#8216;work&#8217;.) Well it finally started &#8220;working&#8221; and I could finally get all the channels I pay for, (which is basically everything) so Jason left and I finally have full HD cable in the bed room. All told there were 4 cable cards used, 2 onsite techs, probably 6 phone techs and 2 online techs that worked on getting my new TiVo working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2010/07/01/tivo-and-comcast-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Internet Explorer exploit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/11/22/another-internet-explorer-exploit/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/11/22/another-internet-explorer-exploit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[M$ Winders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIndows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just released, another exploit to Internet Explorer 6 &#38; 7, that allows &#8220;hackers&#8221; to install software on your machine&#8230; What do the major Antivirus people say: &#8220;To minimize the chances of being affected by this issue, Internet Explorer users should ensure their antivirus definitions are up to date, disable JavaScript and only visit Web sites [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just released, another exploit to Internet Explorer 6 &amp; 7, that allows &#8220;hackers&#8221; to install software on your machine&#8230; What do the major Antivirus people say:</p>
<p>&#8220;To minimize the chances of being affected by this issue, Internet Explorer users should ensure their antivirus definitions    are up to date, disable JavaScript and only visit Web sites they trust until fixes are available from Microsoft,&#8221; Symantec    said.</p>
<p>How many mom and pop&#8217;s out there even know how to disable java script, and only visit sites they trust? Let alone make sure their antivirus definitions are updated. I have seen some virus trick Symantec&#8217;s AV in to thinking the definitions were up to date, and then I go to find hundreds of virus&#8217; on my parents computer. This is just another reason why building the web browser in to the OS is a bad thing and why it should be sandbox&#8217;d off in to its own little area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/11/22/another-internet-explorer-exploit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XM Radio Customer Service</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/02/19/xm-radio-customer-service/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/02/19/xm-radio-customer-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XM Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that XM Radio&#8217;s Customer Service is probably the worst I have ever seen and has gotten worse every year I have had to renew my radio. This year their &#8220;trick&#8221; is that they are now going to start charging an extra fee to use the online part of the XM Radio service. Right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that XM Radio&#8217;s Customer Service is probably the worst I have ever seen and has gotten worse every year I have had to renew my radio. This year their &#8220;trick&#8221; is that they are now going to start charging an extra fee to use the online part of the XM Radio service. Right now it is free but according to this:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Because you are a valued customer and you enjoy listening to XM Radio online, we are offering you a special opportunity to continue to listen online at no cost if you renew your subscription now with one of our longer term plans.</p>
<p>On March 11, 2009, the XM Radio Online listening platform will be upgraded to a higher quality digital audio and no longer included as a part of a base subscription at no charge. If you renew now at www.xmradio.com/lockintoday, you can continue to listen online for FREE for the length of term you choose &#8212; but only if you act quickly. Rest assured, any credits on the account from earlier payments made will be applied to your renewal &#8211; you&#8217;ll only be charged the difference.</p>
<p>Act before March 10!<br />
This is your only chance to keep your online listening at no charge. Beginning March 11, if you wish to listen to XM Radio Online, you will need to purchase a supplemental Premium XM Radio Online subscription for $2.99* per month. Your current XM Radio Online listening privileges will be available at no charge until your next renewal date.**</p>
<p>It&#8217;s Easy to &#8220;Lock In&#8221; &#038; Save. </p></blockquote>
<p>They are going to start charging for the online service. So I decided to &#8220;lock in&#8221; and renew my subscription for my car for 2 years, just so I would have the online service for free for the next 2 years as well. So I went to the web site they listed, and did a 2 year renewal and filled out all my information. The last thing I see is:</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/xmrenew.png" alt="xmrenew" title="xmrenew" width="752" height="605" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1065" /></p>
<p>So I thought all was well. Well it has been 8 days since I did that. No charge has showed up on my credit card, and my &#8220;listenercare&#8221; site on XM&#8217;s web site still shows that my I still have the 1 year service, and it was last paid on March of 2008. </p>
<p>I then went back to XM&#8217;s site, and filled out a billing contact form to ask them what was going on&#8230; What did I get back from them:</p>
<blockquote><p>XM is proud to announce our exciting new lineup.  Along with your favorites, we have added new channels, shows, legendary DJ&#8217;s and celebrity hosts, giving you more of what you love about satellite radio.  You&#8217;ll get 69 commercial-free music channels covering all genres of music, including new channels like Bruce Springsteen&#8217;s E Street Radio, the Grateful Dead Channel, Elvis Radio, Jimmy Buffett&#8217;s Radio Margaritaville, Siriusly Sinatra, Metropolitan Opera Radio, Eminem&#8217;s Shade 45, Jam On, Little Steven&#8217;s Underground Garage and more.  Plus, you&#8217;ll also get new personalities and exclusive shows like Barabara Walters, Chris Mad Dog Russo and Jeff Foxworthy.  And, even more entertainment including Doctor Radio, Blue Collar Radio and the Foxxhole.</p>
<p>Everything you need to know about the new lineup is online at www.xmradio.com/newlineup.  Download the new channel guide and keep it by your radio.  With all of the new programming and personalities, Everything Worth Listening To is Now on XM.</p></blockquote>
<p>Absolutely nothing to do with the question I sent them. I still have not even received any information about what is going on with my account either. So I decided to call the number listed on the email.. Got a man name &#8220;samual&#8221; with an obvious indian accent. He had problems with my account and could not understand why my stuff did not work. He then transfers me to his manager &#8220;winston&#8221; with another indian accent. He then &#8220;fixed&#8221; my account and told me that my credit card would be billed at midnight when their system does billing. So we will see if it works or if I have to make another call back to them yet again.</p>
<p>One thing that XM really needs to do is work on their web site and their customer service. It is just piss poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/02/19/xm-radio-customer-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AIX Most secure OS? Think not.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/02/15/aix-most-secure-os-think-not/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/02/15/aix-most-secure-os-think-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM&#8217;s Xforce published their new 2008 annual report. In it they had this chart: Surprising is that IBM put&#8217;s one of their own OS&#8217;s near the bottom of the list. Some of my opinions are : 1. No one uses AIX that much, so no one looks for holes in the code. 2. Any one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM&#8217;s Xforce published their new 2008 annual report.  In it they had this chart:<br />
<img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/xforce2008.png" alt="xforce2008" title="xforce2008" width="515" height="690" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1062" /></p>
<p>Surprising is that IBM put&#8217;s one of their own OS&#8217;s near the bottom of the list. Some of my opinions are :</p>
<p>1. No one uses AIX that much, so no one looks for holes in the code.<br />
2. Any one who uses AIX, doesn&#8217;t have it directly connected to the Internet.<br />
3. It is so cost prohibitive to use, that people are looking at Solaris/Linux or Windows to run their business on.</p>
<p>But the funniest thing about this is the last I used AIX the following were still done on install by IBM:<br />
1. telnet enabled<br />
2. root logins allowed remotely<br />
3. no ssh comes with the OS, you have to install a crappy &#8220;linux toolkit&#8221;, and then install another 10 different packages to get SSH enabled.<br />
4. No RBAC<br />
5. Syslog configuration does not exist<br />
6. Root does not even have a password on install</p>
<p>Seems to me that IBM needs to fix some fundamental issues with their OWN OS before they can say it is not one of the &#8220;Most Vulnerable Operating Systems&#8221;.</p>
<p>The funniest issue with this is for MacOSX to be listed at the top, all most all of those require some one to actually run something on the machine with administrative privileges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/02/15/aix-most-secure-os-think-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monster hacked again</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/01/23/monster-hacked-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/01/23/monster-hacked-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couldn&#8217;t believe that monster.com was hacked again. So I went to change my password on there, and this is what it showed me when I tried to use a 30 character password: needless to say, I had to settle with a 14 character password before I just deleted the account all together. Hopefully their delete [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t believe that monster.com was hacked again. So I went to change my password on there, and this is what it showed me when I tried to use a 30 character password:</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-3.png" alt="picture-3" title="picture-3" width="749" height="180" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1040" /></p>
<p>needless to say, I had to settle with a 14 character password before I just deleted the account all together. Hopefully their delete is really a delete. Kinda funny when the 30 character password I used was : TMG5IRWX4_hP5_Oi7Zh_N5oLXkeWP_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/01/23/monster-hacked-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transition to Digital TV</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/01/18/transition-to-digital-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/01/18/transition-to-digital-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antenna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a little over 30 days to go till the big transition to Digital TV in America comes, it looks like there are going to be problems with the switch&#8230; The first, supposedly the people of America have failed to realize what they actually need to do for the transition. The second is that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a little over 30 days to go till the big transition to Digital TV in America comes, it looks like there are going to be problems with the switch&#8230; The first, supposedly the people of America have failed to realize what they actually need to do for the transition. The second is that the government has ran out of money for the &#8220;coupons&#8221; to defer the cost of the converter boxes for the older TV&#8217;s that still exist. The third is the misinformation that is coming from various sources and the general misunderstanding of what is actually happening.  So from a high tech person to hopefully the low tech people who still don&#8217;t understand, here is what is actually happening.</p>
<p>1. The airwaves (i.e. radio frequency) is a hot topic right now. The bandwidth (think of a analog TV channel as being road to drive a car on, and there are currently only 67 broadcast &#8220;roads&#8221;) being used by the current analog tv system is worth a lot of &#8220;money&#8221;. So the government has decided to sell off some of the bandwidth that is currently being used by TV to other services (cell, two-way radio, etc). With this change, there is a mandate that all TV (with the exception of Low Power TV stations for the moment) has to move to using a Digital Transmission system, instead of the current analog system. So what is the difference between the current analog and the new digital? One difference is picture quality. With digital, the picture is either 100% crystal clear, or you get no picture at all. As opposed to the old analog where you would get a &#8220;snowy&#8221; picture. In addition, there is no more &#8220;ghosting&#8221; (seeing more than one copy of the same image on the tv.) Ghosting is caused by the analog tv signal bouncing off of structures (buildings, mountains, planes, etc) and arriving at the TV set at different times. </p>
<p>Because of the signal arriving at the TV at different times, you will get multiple different versions of the image on the screen. With digital TV, this is avoided, as each frame of the TV signal is marked with a time stamp. When the TV is &#8220;showing&#8221; you the signal, if it receives a copy of a TV image that it has already shown, it silently discards it in to the &#8220;trash&#8221;, there by making the ghosting go away. Here is a quick picture of what ghosting is in analog tv:<br />
<img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/reflectedtv.png" alt="reflectedtv" title="reflectedtv" width="594" height="412" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1034" /></p>
<p>Back to the highway term. With the current analog broadcast system, each TV channel is allocated 6MHz of bandwidth to broadcast their Video and Audio. Such as this:<br />
<img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/videolane.png" alt="videolane" title="videolane" width="469" height="209" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1035" /></p>
<p>So with only 67 &#8220;lanes&#8221; of TV channels, it limits what can actually be broadcast over the air. There are rules about how close 2 channels can be on the same frequency and on frequencies next to one and another. So most of the over the air channels have been limited to either National Networks, or other &#8220;Independent&#8221; stations. With the change to Digital transmission, it allows for each physical TV station, to broadcast more than 1 &#8220;channel&#8221; in their particular allotment of bandwidth. These other channels are called sub channels and each station can have up to 6 of them in their &#8220;road&#8221;. There by allowing much more content to be delivered over the air. One of the local channels WPXI, originally had their primary channel, and 2 sub channels in their allotment. The primary channel showed the same as what their analog channel 11 showed, but was in HD when the program source was in HD. The second channel 11.2 was a 24 hour a day weather channel. (Which they, NBC, have stopped broadcasting now.) Their third channel 11.3 shows the Retro TV Network. Some of the other Pittsburgh, Morgantown and Clarksburg channels are also using their sub carriers as well. PBS has 3 channels that they use. The interesting one is WBOY in Clarksburg. They are primarily a NBC affiliate, however there is no local ABC affiliate in the Clarksburg area, so they are using one of their sub channels 12.2 to broadcast ABC programming for the Clarksburg area. The FOX in Clarksburg uses one of their sub channels to broadcast the CW network to the local area. </p>
<p>2. So with the change to the digital broadcasting, more people are able to access more programming over the air, then they previously could. But with all good things comes bad things. </p>
<p>Most TV&#8217;s that have not been bought in the last couple of years, do not have a digital tuner in them. This means that all the new programming that is available over the air, can not be received with out a special set top box for the TV. In addition to the special box, you may need a new higher gain antenna than you previously had. The reason is most of the new digital channels are all in the UHF TV band. (As opposed to the VHF band where most of the current &#8220;big&#8221; channels are. )  The reason you need a higher gain antenna, is that because unlike with analog broadcasting where you might be able to see &#8220;part&#8221; of the picture even if it wasn&#8217;t completely clear, if you don&#8217;t have a good signal strength and quality of the digital signal you will not see a picture at all. So if you are watching analog TV over the air with an antenna, and the picture is a little fuzzy, you may be in need of a new high gain antenna, as more than likly the digital signal will not be strong enough for you. But back to the box now, because the government was mandating the change, they set aside money to provide people 2 $40 coupons to defer the cost of purchasing the boxes. </p>
<p>The problem with these coupons, they are only good for 90 days. So a lot of people have requested the coupons, but have not used them, and they have expired. This has caused the program to &#8220;run out of money&#8221;. So now when people go to the dtv2009.gov site, they can only be put on a wait list for the coupon. But considering that there is only 31 days left, the people who have not gotten their coupon&#8217;s will end up paying full price for their boxes. I almost was one of these people. I have requested the coupons but forgot till about 2 days before they expired that I had them. So I went to Radio Shack and bought two <a href="http://www.zenith.com/products/set-top-atsc-digital-to-analog-converter-box/DTT901/">Zenith DTT901</a> boxes. The boxes have a nice guide interface and work good. But for them to work well, I needed an antenna. To see what I could possibly get with out buying an expensive high gain UHF antenna, I made one out of some stuff I had around the house. My &#8220;Antenna&#8221; is made out of a piece of 2&#215;4, some stiff cardboard, heavy duty aluminum foil and some 12 guage electrical wire. The basic design looks like this:</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/uhf-antenna.png" alt="uhf-antenna" title="uhf-antenna" width="444" height="557" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1036" /></p>
<p>Basically I wrapped the piece of card board with the aluminum foil. Then I tacked it to the back side of a 2 x 4 that was on it&#8217;s end. (tacked to the 2&#8243; side). Then using some screws and washers I screwed in 10 screws with 3 washers each in to the other side of the 2&#215;4. The first set of screws are about 3 inches from the top. Then the next set are 7 inches, 3.5, 3.5 and 7 inches. Next up was to take the 12 gauge wire, and cut 8 pieces that are 14 inches in length. Bend each piece at 7 inches, so that the ends are 3 inches apart. Those then get attached to the 2&#215;4 with the screws/washers. Then take 2 more long pieces of 12 gauge wire and attach it as shown to all the screw posts, making sure to have the cross&#8217; as shown. The final thing is to attach a 300ohm to 75ohm balun to the middle screws. This cheap antenna allowed me to get the local PBS channels and one of the Pittsburgh channels (Channel 4, which is on channel 51). I can also get some signal from some of the other channels, but not enough for them to actually come in. This could be fixed by a pre-amp, or adding another antenna to this one. This antenna is not meant for outside use either, as it would not stand up to any wind or other harsh elements, it is only meant to see if it is possible to pick up digital signals. </p>
<p>3. Finally the misinformation and general misunderstanding of what the actual digital switch is about. When any one asks me about the digital transition, I usually try to figure out what they currently do for television service and then base the answer on that. For example, my parents thought that the new HDTV broadcasts that are over the air, were going to be a for-pay service (ala cable, satellite). I told them that it was free and in the clear, just as it has always been. Other people think that even though they have cable or satellite that they have to get the new digital box just watch tv. For the most part this is false, but there has been some stuff going on in the cable world that is sort of making this true. See the cable companies are doing their own &#8220;digital conversion&#8221;. In the cable world, they use the same &#8220;roads&#8221; that the broadcasters use, but it is in a closed system. (Think of it as a toll road.) They also fall under the same problem that the analog broadcasters were. They can only show one channel per &#8220;road&#8221;. So they are starting to migrate most of all their channels to &#8220;digital&#8221; channels. This means that in the place that one analog channel is, there can be many digital channels (see <a href="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/12/29/comcast-morgantown-lineup/">Comcast morgantown lineup</a>). This allows the cable company to supposedly give you more channels (of which some times there is nothing worth watching on). But with the move to digital, the cable companies are encrypting those channels, so people can not &#8220;pirate&#8221; cable and get access to something they shouldn&#8217;t have.. So what does this have to do with the digital conversion? Well now all those &#8220;cable ready&#8221; tv&#8217;s will start to become obsolete, and they will require addressable cable boxes in order to receive channels that you used to be able to receive with no cable box.  It is also interesting that some cable companies are doing this switch around the same time as the over the air broadcast switch, and they are telling customers that it is a government mandate. This also means that the cable companies will more than likely start charging things differently now that they can block specific channels. It would be nice if they did have an a la carte pricing model, but I don&#8217;t see that happening any time soon. </p>
<p>In addition to the confusion, President-Elect Obama, is asking for a delay of the transition so that the public can be more prepared. Even West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, the new chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, introduced legislation that would postpone the digital transition by almost four months. “I firmly believe that our nation is not yet ready to make this transition,” Rockefeller said in a statement. So how have other countries around the world handled the transition. I have been to a couple already that have made the switch, wonder what delays they had and how they handled it.  But for right now, if you use cable, you shouldn&#8217;t need to worry. If you use satellite, you don&#8217;t need to worry. If you have bought a new tv in the last 2 years, you don&#8217;t need to worry. The only reason you should be worrying is if your tv is more than 3 years old, you use rabbit ears or a roof/attic antenna, and you haven&#8217;t purchased a digital tv box yet. Also remember if you have a VCR, it will need a box as well, or you will not be able to tape one show and then watch another at the same time, like you can now. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/01/18/transition-to-digital-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>how time has changed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/12/20/how-time-has-changed/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/12/20/how-time-has-changed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I walked around the mall and stores today it is surprising at what people do. Most people I saw were walking around with the cell phone affixed to their head. The funny ones were the man/woman couple&#8217;s that were walking together talking on their own phones to who ever. (would have been pretty funny [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I walked around the mall and stores today it is surprising at what people do. Most people I saw were walking around with the cell phone affixed to their head. The funny ones were the man/woman couple&#8217;s that were walking together talking on their own phones to who ever. (would have been pretty funny if they were talking to each other.) Then there are the parents that are taking their kids around to shop. Everything from the very young to the teen ager&#8217;s. Considering it was only 30° yet, they let their kids be out in shorts and tshirts with no jackets. Then you hear them coughing and hacking their heads off while they are walking behind you.</p>
<p>The next funny thing is seeing a woman that was about 400 lbs wearing a t-shirt that said &#8220;to hot to love&#8221;. Turned around and saw another very large woman with a sweatshirt that had murder spelled backwards on it. Not sure what that meant.</p>
<p>If I only had a camera with me, it would have been a sight to see.</p>
<p>And the final thing, if you are the owner of a big box store, and have 20+ checkout lanes, and there are more than 3 people in each line, please freaking open more than 4 lines for people to check out in. (cough walmart cough)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/12/20/how-time-has-changed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ca.. y.u .ea. .e n.w?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/12/11/ca-yu-ea-e-nw/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/12/11/ca-yu-ea-e-nw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again, darn AT&#38;T sucks&#8230; When I got home my data connection on my AT&#38;T phone no longer works and I only have 1 bar of signal. Yet, my verizon phone has 5 bars and full data and it is sitting right next to the AT&#38;T&#8230; Need to look at getting rid of the AT&#38;T [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, darn AT&amp;T sucks&#8230; When I got home my data connection on my AT&amp;T phone no longer works and I only have 1 bar of signal. Yet, my verizon phone has 5 bars and full data and it is sitting right next to the AT&amp;T&#8230; Need to look at getting rid of the AT&amp;T one. They really need to work on their coverage, if they want to &#8220;have the most bars, in the most places&#8221; cause as it stands now I get better coverage on a provider that is not even native to the area than I do with a native coverage provider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/12/11/ca-yu-ea-e-nw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More bars in more places&#8230;. but only if it is an urban place</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/11/28/more-bars-in-more-places-but-only-if-it-is-an-urban-place/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/11/28/more-bars-in-more-places-but-only-if-it-is-an-urban-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since having my cell phone switched to AT&#38;T, I have noticed more problems that when I had US Cellular. Now while driving up the interstate the signal goes up and down, sometimes cutting out completely. In fact at home my signal goes between 1 and 2 bars&#8230; US Cellular at least had 4 or 5.. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since having my cell phone switched to <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/welcome/index.jsp">AT&amp;T</a>, I have noticed more problems that when I had<a href="http://www.uscc.com/uscellular/SilverStream/Pages/uscellular.html"> US Cellular</a>. Now while driving up the interstate the signal goes up and down, sometimes cutting out completely. In fact at home my signal goes between 1 and 2 bars&#8230; US Cellular at least had 4 or 5.. So everytime I see one of those commercials, it just makes me mad, as unless you are in a highly populated area, your stuck with the same old crappy coverage that Cellular One had before AT&amp;T bought them out. The only good thing about the new one, is that the GPS works in it with Google Maps. But other than that, the internet access is slow, calls dropped and the coverage sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/11/28/more-bars-in-more-places-but-only-if-it-is-an-urban-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
