<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>unixwiz &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz</link>
	<description>anything dealing with *NIX or what ever I want to write about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone security patch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/09/16/iphone-security-patch/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/09/16/iphone-security-patch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CERT-US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that Apple finally released a patch for the iPhone about the security issue I wrote about back on May 1st (More Security Stuff) From Apple&#8217;s Web Site: WebKit CVE-ID: CVE-2009-2797 Available for: iPhone OS 1.0 through 3.0.1, iPhone OS for iPod touch 1.1 through 3.0 Impact: User names and passwords in URLs may [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Apple finally released a patch for the iPhone about the security issue I wrote about back on May 1st (<a href="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/05/01/more-security-stuff/">More Security Stuff</a>) </p>
<p>From Apple&#8217;s Web Site:</p>
<blockquote><p>WebKit</p>
<p>CVE-ID: CVE-2009-2797</p>
<p>Available for: iPhone OS 1.0 through 3.0.1, iPhone OS for iPod touch 1.1 through 3.0</p>
<p>Impact: User names and passwords in URLs may be disclosed to linked sites</p>
<p>Description: Safari includes the user name and password from the original URL in the referer header. This may lead to the disclosure of sensitive information. This update addresses the issue by not including user names and passwords in referer headers. Credit to James A. T. Rice of Jump Networks Ltd for reporting this issue.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not sure when James reported it though. So I don&#8217;t know if I found it before him or not. <strong>Anyways, here is my suggestion, if you use an iPhone and have EVER logged in to a web site with a username and password, you need to change that password immediately and then apply the patch from Apple to your iPhone. I know there are some people who view my site that use an iPhone and are clicking on links from other websites, therefore sending your username and password to me as well. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/09/16/iphone-security-patch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow Leopard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/08/29/snow-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/08/29/snow-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX 10.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received my copy of Snow Leopard today from Apple. They overnighted it and fedex was kind enough to call and tell me they tried to deliver it but was unable to. I stopped by the Fedex depot on the way home and picked it up. I decided to load it on the Laptop first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received my copy of Snow Leopard today from Apple. They overnighted it and fedex was kind enough to call and tell me they tried to deliver it but was unable to. I stopped by the Fedex depot on the way home and picked it up. I decided to load it on the Laptop first because I have heard of some problems with Adobe Photoshop Elements (which I run on the Mac Pro desktop). </p>
<p>So what are my thoughts:<br />
1. I think Apple shipped some faulty DVD&#8217;s. Everytime I put it in my MacBook Pro, it would try to read it and then it would eject it.  I put it in the MacPro desktop and it came right up. So back to the MBP and it continued to just eject it. I then attached an LG External USB DVD drive, and it seemed to have some problems reading it on there. I then did the Apple Software update (there were a couple of Security alerts available) thinking that may help. Didn&#8217;t appear to. Then all of the sudden it loaded the installer. After an hour later and 2 reboots Snow Leopard was installed via the USB drive. They still need to work on their installer, it set at the &#8220;Time Remaining : Less than a minute&#8221; for over 10 minutes. </p>
<p>2. The initial startup seemed to take some time, but have not tried rebooting it yet. </p>
<p>3. The Finder seems extremely faster. </p>
<p>4. It free&#8217;d up almost 10 gig of disk space for me. I started the install with only 17gb free. After the install I now have 27.11 gb free. </p>
<p>So far I havn&#8217;t tried any of the other apps I use, but Adium X 1.4b9 seems to run well. I also like the new Expose, seems to organize stuff a little better. Will have to see what else has changed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/08/29/snow-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The PC Tax</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/04/16/the-pc-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/04/16/the-pc-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M$ Winders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIndows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading this PDF about the Apple Tax, I  find it interesting that they do not include anything about the PC Tax&#8230;.. So here is my take on the stuff that is missing: 1. OS Upgrades for a multiple PC house vs a multiple MAC House. Most households probably have more than one PC/Mac in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading this PDF about the <a href="http://www.ndpta.com/files/AppleTax.pdf">Apple Tax</a>, I  find it interesting that they do not include anything about the PC Tax&#8230;..</p>
<p>So here is my take on the stuff that is missing:</p>
<p>1. OS Upgrades for a multiple PC house vs a multiple MAC House. Most households probably have more than one PC/Mac in the house now days. So when a new OS comes out, how much does it take to &#8220;upgrade&#8221; the house.. Looking at the current price of Microsoft Vista Home Premimum, it is $115.99 for the Upgrade edition. MacOSX Leopard is currently $129.00. So for one computer, yes MacOS is a little more expensive, but lets look at if you have 4 computers in the house. To upgrade your 4 PC&#8217;s to Vista, you are going to pay $463.96. If you have 4 Mac&#8217;s, to upgrade them to MacOS X Leopard, $199.00.. Yes that is correct it costs you $264.96 more to upgrade 4 PC&#8217;s than it does to upgrade 4 Mac&#8217;s. This is because Apple offers a &#8220;family pack&#8221; pricing, which allows you to install the software on up to 5 Mac&#8217;s in the same household. Microsoft does not do this.</p>
<p>2. Office Software. If all you need is basic Word processing and spread sheet&#8217;s, iWork from Apple does everything you would need. Once again a single upgrade would cost $79, and they offer a family pack too, for $99 you can upgrade 5 Mac&#8217;s. Now look at Microsoft Office Home and Student it is $94.45 per computer. So for 4 PC&#8217;s, we are up to $377.80 now vs the $99 for iWork on the Mac. Difference of $278.80.</p>
<p>3. Virus protection. For the most part (read as 99%) Mac&#8217;s are free of Virus&#8217;. So there is no &#8220;software&#8221; needed on them. But on PC&#8217;s you better not even connect it to the Interwebs with out having a virus protection software on the machine. So If we look at the sort of &#8220;defacto&#8221; Norton Antivirus, it costs $39.99 a YEAR per PC. So for our 4 PC&#8217;s it would be $159.96 a YEAR, whereas our Mac is $0.</p>
<p>If we add all this up as if Vista and Office just came out, our cost for upgrading a house of 4 PC&#8217;s would be $1,001.72.. Versus if we were to upgrade a house of 4 Mac&#8217;s to the newest MacOSX and iWork, it would cost $298.00. For a difference of $703.72. So a having a house of Mac&#8217;s is about 70% cheaper to upgrade than a house of PC&#8217;s is.</p>
<p>One section of the article is just plain wrong:</p>
<blockquote><p>Finally, there is a category of costs that could be called opportunity costs, options that are simply not<br />
available in the Apple world.  These options include cutting edge technologies that buyers really want<br />
including HDMI (for connecting a PC to a TV for viewing high-definition content), the aforementioned<br />
Blu-Ray, eSATA (for fast access to external storage), media card readers (for interoperation with other<br />
digital devices like cameras), built-in 3G wireless (to stay connected anywhere cell service is live),<br />
fingerprint readers (to easily access secure data), and TV Tuners (to watch and record broadcast<br />
content).  These technologies, revolutionary now, will one day be standard on all systems.  Too bad if<br />
a Mac buyer has any interest in them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Has the person never heard of USB media card readers? They are UNIVERSAL&#8230; I have a couple of them, work great with the Mac. I also have an <a href="http://elgato.com/elgato/na/mainmenu/products/hybrid09/product1.en.html">Elgato USB TV Tuner</a> that does HDTV, clear QAM and allows my Mac to record shows. There is no reason  you couldn&#8217;t put a Blu-Ray reader in a Mac Pro, or even get a USB enclosure for it. Just because some PC&#8217;s come with all this stuff built in, unless you are going to user it, does it really matter if it is there. Heck I have a new printer that has one of the Media Card readers in it, so when it is connected via USB to the Mac it looks like any other removable media device.</p>
<p>The final part of the article that sort of is ridiculous, is the author assumes that to do wireless on a Mac you need an Airport Extreme. Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is a reason it is called 802.11[abng] it is a standard that EVERYONE uses. You don&#8217;t need to have a specific brand unless you really want to be brand loyal or don&#8217;t know any better. I have a $40 Linksys wireless router that works 100% fine with the Mac&#8217;s I use. He also talks about the $100 cost for the family pack of the iLife software. I have 3 versions of this, and it is worth the money. Microsoft has NO comparable software offering for that price with the functionality that iLife provides. Even if they did, they would not be selling 5 licenses for $100. It would probably be $50 to $80 per license.</p>
<p>The other issue that he brings up is that most software that works on Windows XP will work on Vista, but people who switch from PC to Mac will have to buy all new software. This is not entirly true. You can use Windows XP/Vista on Mac Hardware either via BootCamp or VMWare Fusion/Parallels Desktop. I do this for a couple of applications that I need that are only available on Windows. But for the most part I have found that everything I need for my day to day computing on the Mac is free software. There are only a couple of programs I have bought because I needed functionality that the provided.. But for the most part there are equivalent Mac programs for every Windows one, and most of the time they are better and some times Free.</p>
<p>I think the next time before some one tries to say how much more Mac&#8217;s cost they need to really do their home work. Yes the hardware costs more up front, but in the long run, it last longer, runs better and has less problems. I used to have a Dual G4 for a desktop. It used dual 533Mhz processors and ran MacOSX Tiger just fine. Try running Vista on a Pentium III and we will talk.. Windows is getting better about the bloat, but they still have a LONG way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/04/16/the-pc-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Buy suckering people</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/02/02/best-buy-suckering-people/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/02/02/best-buy-suckering-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 00:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/02/02/best-buy-suckering-people/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to Best Buy today to walk around and get out of the house. While I was there I walked past their little Mac section of the store. There was a man there looking and playing with a MacBook Pro. A Best Buy person came over and asked him if he needed any help. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to Best Buy today to walk around and get out of the house. While I was there I walked past their little Mac section of the store. There was a man there looking and playing with a MacBook Pro. A Best Buy person came over and asked him if he needed any help. So the man proceeded to ask the Best Buy person how he would transfer his files from his PC to the Mac if he bought it. What I heard next just made me mad&#8230; She told him that in order to transfer the files to the new Mac he would need some expensive software or he could bring the PC in to Best Buy and they would transfer all his files over for a charge. Why is it stores like this try to get any amount of money they can out of people who are computer un-savy? </p>
<p>People it is really easy to move stuff between PC and Mac. Apple even has a small <a href="http://www.apple.com/findouthow/macosx/#basics-move">2:30 minute video</a> on how to do it.. Don&#8217;t let the Big Box stores charge you for something that is easy and any one can do it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/02/02/best-buy-suckering-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Care worth the extra expense</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/12/21/apple-care-worth-the-extra-expense/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/12/21/apple-care-worth-the-extra-expense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/12/21/apple-care-worth-the-extra-expense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I bought my MacBook Pro I opted to get the Apple Care Extended warranty. I am so glad I did now. Since I have had my MBP, I have had 3 different batteries and now tonight I called to get a new power adapter, as the cord where the magsafe adapter is is starting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I bought my MacBook Pro I opted to get the Apple Care Extended warranty. I am so glad I did now. Since I have had my MBP, I have had 3 different batteries and now tonight I called to get a new power adapter, as the cord where the magsafe adapter is is starting to come out of the boot. So I called tonight and talked to Steve, who was having problems with his machine, but once I told him what I needed he said &#8220;If you have enough battery, disconnect the power cable now. It may spark and cause a fire.&#8221; It has not gotten that loose yet, but it needed replaced. If you did not have Apple Care, it would cost you $79.00 + TAX to get a new one. All told the amount I would have spent on replacement parts would be over $400.</p>
<p>So my recommendation, if you are going to buy a Apple, get the AppleCare along with it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/12/21/apple-care-worth-the-extra-expense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First couple of hours with Leopard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/10/27/first-couple-of-hours-with-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/10/27/first-couple-of-hours-with-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/10/27/first-couple-of-hours-with-leopard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Went and picked up MacOSX Leopard today&#8230; I decided to do a fresh install instead of trying to upgrade my current Tiger installation on my MacBook Pro. Well after backing up my entire hard drive to a external drive. I started the Installation. It took about an hour for it to install. The funny part [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went and picked up MacOSX Leopard today&#8230; I decided to do a fresh install instead of trying to upgrade my current Tiger installation on my MacBook Pro. Well after backing up my entire hard drive to a external drive. I started the Installation. It took about an hour for it to install. The funny part is 30 minutes of it, was the installer verifying the integrity of of the DVD. First time I have seen an OS verify the entire disk before it started to even do an install to the hard drive. Anyways, 30 minutes after the verification was done, it was installed. The opening video is pretty cool basically flying through space.  I then started the restoration of my files from the external USB Drive. Funny thing was as soon as I plugged the drive in to the MBP, time machine kicked in and asked if I wanted to use the external drive as a back up device. So I said yes and it started backing up what I had just installed while I was restoring files from the same drive. </p>
<p>Some little things I have noticed now:</p>
<ol>
<li>If you leave iCal on the Doc, it now shows the current date, unlike Tiger only showing it if you had it actually running. </li>
<li>Everything seems a lot quicker than Tiger. But it could also be that I had not reinstalled Tiger since I had bought the MBP.</li>
<li>Coverflow in finder. It is cool for going through my documents folder.</li>
</ol>
<p>I also picked up the new iLife 08. I like the new iPhoto. Now to just get everything set back up the way I had it before.. So far I like what I see, and like the new speed..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/10/27/first-couple-of-hours-with-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semi Native Java Client for Solaris x86 and MacOSX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/06/19/semi-native-java-client-for-solaris-x86-and-macosx/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/06/19/semi-native-java-client-for-solaris-x86-and-macosx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I got tired of not having a good Citrix client for Solaris X86, and the one for MacOSX sucks because of the fixed window size. (The solaris sparc client lets you have seemless windows, but the MacOSX one doesn&#8217;t for some really stupid reason.) Any ways, I decided to try and figure out how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I got tired of not having a good Citrix client for Solaris X86, and the one for MacOSX sucks because of the fixed window size. (The solaris sparc client lets you have seemless windows, but the MacOSX one doesn&#8217;t for some really stupid reason.)</p>
<p>Any ways, I decided to try and figure out how to get the JAVA Citrix Web client to run locally with out the need for a web server. Well tonight I figured it out, and it works so far for what I need. It does give one error on startup, but it does not affect the use of the client as far as I know.</p>
<p>So how do you do it? Pretty &#8220;easy&#8221;:</p>
<ol>
<li>Download the Citrix JAVA client (I got 9.3) from Citrix&#8217;s web site, Note, it will say that you should not try to install it your self&#8230; well I can&#8217;t read that part <img src='http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
<li>Unzip it in to a directory, I.E. /home/{userid}/citrix</li>
<li>Create an App script, for example this is what I use for accessing GroupWise (eck!) from Citrix:
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;"><span class="re3">#!/bin/sh</span><br />
<span class="re2">CLASSPATH=</span><span class="st0">&quot;JICA-coreN.jar:JICA-browseN.jar:JICA-configN.jar:JICA-seamlessN.jar:JICA-clipboardN.jar:$CLASSPATH&quot;</span><br />
<span class="kw3">export</span> CLASSPATH<br />
/usr/bin/java &nbsp;com.citrix.ConnectionCenter -address:CitrixICA.Server.Addrses -InitialProgram:<span class="st0">&quot;#GroupWise 65 SP4&quot;</span> \<br />
-HTTPBrowserAddress:CitrixICA.Server.Address -TWIMode:on -desiredcolor:<span class="nu0">4</span></div>
</div>
</li>
<li>The desiredcolor make is so that it uses the higher color palette, otherwise you get the nice 256 colors</li>
<li>TWIMode is for the Seamless windows</li>
<li>Initial Program is the name of the App that is published on the Citrix Server.</li>
</ol>
<p>I tested this from my MacOSX 10.4.6 MacBookPro, and from my Solaris 10 x86 machine. Works fine on both. I will say though don&#8217;t tr to run it in TWM (I ran it through vnc), not fun to deal with right now. Hope this helps some other people who are missing a good client for each of these os&#8217;. I am going to see about drive mapping next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/06/19/semi-native-java-client-for-solaris-x86-and-macosx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Ad&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/06/19/apple-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/06/19/apple-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M$ Winders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if you haven&#8217;t seen them on the tv already, there are 3 new Apple Mac tv ad&#8217;s. I was joking with a co-worker today that Apples new slogan should be: An Apple a day keeps Dr. Watson away For those who don&#8217;t know what Dr. Watson is, it is a program error debuger for Windows. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you haven&#8217;t seen them on the tv already, there are 3 new <a href="http://www.apple.com/getamac/">Apple Mac</a> tv ad&#8217;s.  I was joking with a co-worker today that Apples new slogan should be:</p>
<p><b>An Apple a day keeps Dr. Watson away</b></p>
<p>For those who don&#8217;t know what <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;308538">Dr. Watson</a> is, it is a program error debuger for Windows.</p>
<p>If Apple had a contest for new slogans I wish I could enter this to win something <img src='http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/06/19/apple-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacBook Pro and PEAP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/04/macbook-pro-and-peap/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/04/macbook-pro-and-peap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple finally released the patch yesterday as an update to MacOSX. 10.4.6 fixes the PEAP issue with the MacBook Pro. 160 meg download. Not &#8220;too&#8221; bad that it took a couple of weeks to get the official fix out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple finally released the patch yesterday as an update to MacOSX. 10.4.6 fixes the PEAP issue with the MacBook Pro. 160 meg download. Not &#8220;too&#8221; bad that it took a couple of weeks to get the official fix out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/04/macbook-pro-and-peap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacBook Pro and PEAP authenication</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/03/25/macbook-pro-and-peap-authenication/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/03/25/macbook-pro-and-peap-authenication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well for the past 2 weeks we have been trying to get the MacBook Pro&#8217;s to connect to a Cisco Wireless access point. The only problem is the access points are configured to use PEAP for authenication. But for what ever reason PEAP does not work on the MacBook Pro. It works on all PowerPC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well for the past 2 weeks we have been trying to get the MacBook Pro&#8217;s to connect to a Cisco Wireless access point. The only problem is the access points are configured to use PEAP for authenication. But for what ever reason PEAP does not work on the MacBook Pro. It works on all PowerPC based Macs, but none of the Intel ones. </p>
<p>There are several people with the same problem discussing it <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=376871">here</a> in the MacBook Pro discussion forum on Apple&#8217;s website.</p>
<p>The University of Iowa has a <a href="https://helpdesk.its.uiowa.edu/wireless/intelmacwep.htm">page</a> on it as well.</p>
<p>I have talked to Apple on the phone a couple of times, and they did now know anything, but I credit that with the fact that I think they were level 1 people. I did finally get something from a higher support level and they wanted some captures done and sent to them so I did that. Hopefully they will get it fixed soon, as this is a little annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/03/25/macbook-pro-and-peap-authenication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
