<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>unixwiz &#187; Sun Studio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/category/sun-studio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz</link>
	<description>anything dealing with *NIX or what ever I want to write about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Make sure you install the Sun Studio Patches</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/15/make-sure-you-install-the-sun-studio-patches/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/15/make-sure-you-install-the-sun-studio-patches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sun Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X2100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I was going along compiling IMAP, PHP, Apache, etc.. and start Apache up with SSL enabled and everytime I try to go to an SSL page I see this in the error log: [Sat Apr 15 22:21:42 2006] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (server sungeek.net:443, client 10.0.0.138) (OpenSSL library error follows) [Sat Apr 15 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I was going along compiling IMAP, PHP, Apache, etc.. and start Apache up with SSL enabled and everytime I try to go to an SSL page I see this in the error log:</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >[Sat Apr 15 22:21:42 2006] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (server sungeek.net:443, client 10.0.0.138) (OpenSSL library error follows)<br />
[Sat Apr 15 22:21:42 2006] [error] OpenSSL: error:1408F455:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption failed or bad record mac</div>
<p>To make a long story short, it appears there is a bug in the Sun Studio 11 compilers when compiling OpenSSL. If you are on Solaris x86, you need to have patch 120759-04 installed to fix this problem. (The problem will also show up if you do a make test, you will get an error on the test_evp). For Solaris on Sparc the Patch is 120760-03. Now if it off to recompile all the software again. At least I have gotten everything in 32 bit mode now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/15/make-sure-you-install-the-sun-studio-patches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update to the 32bit vs 64bit problems</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/15/update-to-the-32bit-vs-64bit-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/15/update-to-the-32bit-vs-64bit-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X2100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading the entire CC man page for Sun Studio 11, I think I had figured out what was wrong. All was well until I got to compileing OpenSSL.. It appears that OpenSSL does not pay attention to the CFLAGS environment variable. But if you run Configure solaris-x86-cc instead of the &#8220;config&#8221; command it will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the entire CC man page for Sun Studio 11, I think I had figured out what was wrong. All was well until I got to compileing OpenSSL.. It appears that OpenSSL does not pay attention to the CFLAGS environment variable. But if you run </p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;">Configure solaris-x86-<span class="kw2">cc</span></div>
</div>
<p>instead of the &#8220;config&#8221; command it will force it to compile it as 32 bit instead of 64 bit which the config command does. </p>
<p>I also set these environment variables to force 32 bit compile on some other stuff:</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc<br />
CFLAGS=-fast -xarch=generic<br />
CXXFLAGS=-fast -xarch=generic</div>
<p>Not more than 10 minutes ago while I was doing this, Chris Quenelle posted an <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/quenelle?entry=32_versus_64_bit_programs">Article about 32 versus 64 bit programs</a> that explains some more of the issues..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/15/update-to-the-32bit-vs-64bit-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea becoming a reality</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/13/idea-becoming-a-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/13/idea-becoming-a-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to long ago, I asked why the Sun Studio Compilers weren&#8217;t bundled by default, since they are now free. As Chris Quenelle had mentioned in my post, that the outlook looked good. He posted today that it is coming. Yeah!&#8230; Now if I can just figure out the whole 32bit/64 bit thing and why [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to long ago, I asked why the <a href="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=508">Sun Studio Compilers</a> weren&#8217;t bundled by default, since they are now free. As <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/quenelle">Chris Quenelle</a> had mentioned in my post, that the outlook looked good. He posted today <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/quenelle?entry=sun_studio_and_solaris_integration">that it is coming</a>. Yeah!&#8230; Now if I can just figure out the whole 32bit/64 bit thing and why some stuff likes to chose one over the other and how I can force everything to one.</p>
<p>I think that Sun allowing their employees to post stuff to the <a href="http://blogs.sun.com">blogs.sun.com</a> is one of the coolest things. I have found out more about upcoming cool stuff from Sun from the blogs than I have found out from any where else. Keep up the good work Sun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/04/13/idea-becoming-a-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea for Solaris 11/Express</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/01/18/idea-for-solaris-11express/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/01/18/idea-for-solaris-11express/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 04:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I set here upgrading my Laptop from Solaris Express nv16 to nv30, I had the thought, why doesn&#8217;t Sun bundle the Sun Studio 11 compilers with the OS? GCC is nice and all, but now that the Studio 11 compilers are &#8220;free&#8221; why can&#8217;t they be bundled either in place of GCC or along [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I set here upgrading my Laptop from Solaris Express nv16 to nv30, I had the thought, why doesn&#8217;t Sun bundle the <a href="http://developers.sun.com/prodtech/cc/products/index.html">Sun Studio 11</a> compilers  with the OS? GCC is nice and all, but now that the Studio 11 compilers are &#8220;free&#8221; why can&#8217;t they be bundled either in place of GCC or along with GCC. I like the Sun Compilers/Studio so much better as the code they produce is faster and smaller than the GCC stuff. Another benefit of it, fix the following &#8220;error&#8221;:</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;"><span class="re3"># <span class="kw2">which</span> cc</span><br />
/usr/ucb/<span class="kw2">cc</span><br />
<span class="re3"># <span class="kw2">cc</span> <span class="kw3">test</span>.c</span><br />
/usr/ucb/<span class="kw2">cc</span>: &nbsp;language optional software package not installed<br />
<span class="re3">#</span></div>
</div>
<p>Although it is not really an &#8220;error&#8221; persay, those new to Solaris are often asking where are the compilers at and why does it always say that they are not installed.</p>
<p>So any one from Sun have any input on this, whether it is planned or even feasible? I would love to be able to install everything from one DVD and all during the initial install.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Solaris" rel="tag">Solaris</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Sun+Studio" rel="tag"> Sun Studio</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Sun" rel="tag"> Sun</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2006/01/18/idea-for-solaris-11express/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
