<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>unixwiz &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/category/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz</link>
	<description>anything dealing with *NIX or what ever I want to write about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 is naughty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2010/02/13/windows-7-is-naughty/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2010/02/13/windows-7-is-naughty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M$ Winders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diskutil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I set out to see if Windows 7 would run MS Flight Simulator X any better than Windows XP did. I found that Windows XP on my Mac Pro (Dual Xeon with 10GB of ram) ran very sluggish. Partly because Windows XP (32-Bit) would only recognize about 3.5 Gig of the 10GB of ram [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I set out to see if Windows 7 would run MS Flight Simulator X any better than Windows XP did. I found that Windows XP on my Mac Pro (Dual Xeon with 10GB of ram) ran very sluggish. Partly because Windows XP  (32-Bit) would only recognize about 3.5 Gig of the 10GB of ram that was installed in the machine. So since I recently got a Technet subscription (I seem to have to do a little more Windows stuff now at work, so thought I might as well learn what I have to manage) I downloaded the Windows Ultimate 7 to see how it would perform before going out and buying it. So I did a Time Machine backup of my data on my Mac Pro and then inserted in the Windows 7 disc and hit the &#8220;go&#8221;. It took a couple of hours to do the install, patch it, update boot camp stuff and install Flight Simulator. Once it was installed I was impressed that it actually performed much better than it did on Windows XP. I could actually turn the graphics stuff up on it and almost run it at 1900&#215;1200 with out any jerking around. I then did a couple of flights and then it was time to boot back in to MacOS to get some real work done. This is when I about lost it.. </p>
<p>See when I booted windows 7 it had found the other 3 data drives that were all HFS+ drives in my Mac. It decided to assign a drive letter to them all. I went in and un did that as I did not want Windows to touch those drives. I thought all was well, until I booted in to MacOS. When I logged in, it told me that the drives could not be read, and it couldn&#8217;t find my home directory (which was one of those drives). I was PISSED! So the first thing I did was pop up the disk utility and this is what I saw (minus the 2 1TB seagate drives):<br />
<img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/diskutilygui.png" alt="" title="diskutilygui" width="763" height="713" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1264" /></p>
<p>What pissed me off was that every partition I clicked on, it said it was an MS-DOS partition. Surely Windows didn&#8217;t screw around and format all my drives.. I was at a loss, all my data was on there, 20,000+ pictures, all the video I was working on, everything&#8230; So I decided to see what I could see from the command line. So off to the command line, and I ran the &#8220;diskutil list&#8221; command and saw this:<br />
<img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/diskutilkust.png" alt="" title="diskutillist" width="598" height="297" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1265" /></p>
<p>Yup, Micro$oft had screwed with my partitions.. So I was hoping that maybe it just changed the partition type and my data was still there. So I poked around to see if there was a way to change the partition type. In the gui tool, the only way to do it is to &#8220;format&#8221; it over, which meant I would loose everthing, and I didn&#8217;t have any backups, as the disk2 in there was my Time Machine backup drive. So thinking to my Solaris side, I knew there was a program called &#8220;fstyp&#8221; that would tell you what a particular disk slice was formated as. So I gave it a shot and MacOS has that program:</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/fsmount.png" alt="" title="fsmount" width="401" height="140" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1266" /></p>
<p>So I ran the fstyp util againest one of the slices, and it came back saying it was HFS&#8230; Hot diggity dog.. Maybe my data is still all there.. So I did a mount on it as readonly and it worked. I could see all the data on the drive. So I immediatly started copying data from the drive to an external USB drive (the first 1TB seagate drive in the picture above). But the problem now was, I had 3 x 500GB harddrives of information. The 1TB drive only had about 400GB free. So off to Best Buy and I picked up a Seagate 1TB Firewire drive. Brought it home and mounted up the other partitions and started copying the data. It has been going on for about 2 hours or more now on the copy. I will say that the Seagate Firewire 800 drive is spanking the ass off of the Seagate USB drive. </p>
<p>Once I have backed up all the data.. (Hint use the ditto command) I will see if there is a way to change the partition type with out reformatting the drive. If there isn&#8217;t then I will have to reformat and then ditto the data back on to the Internal drives.. </p>
<p>Hopefully this will help some one else if they get the same problem, and it (MacOS) tells you &#8220;you must initialize the drive&#8221;. DONT. Tell it to cancel and then you can save your data.. If you initialize it, you may end up loosing all your data.</p>
<p>&#8212;Update</p>
<p>As I waited for the data to finish copying I decided to test some stuff on my time machine drive. I read a bunch on the GUID labels that are on the disks. Using the gpt command i did a listing of the GUID info for the drive. Using that information I deleted the index 2 and added a new one with the Apple HFS GUID label:</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;">gpt -r show /dev/disk2<br />
gpt remove -i <span class="nu0">2</span> /dev/disk2<br />
gpt add -b <span class="nu0">409640</span> -s <span class="nu0">976101344</span> -i <span class="nu0">2</span> -t <span class="st0">&quot;48465300-0000-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC&quot;</span> /dev/disk2</div>
</div>
<p><img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/fixdrive.png" alt="" title="fixdrive" width="751" height="243" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1270" /></p>
<p>In the above, you can see I removed index 2. As soon as I did that, this window popped up:<br />
<img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/initdisk.png" alt="" title="initdisk" width="446" height="158" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1271" /></p>
<p>I just selected ignore on it. Then went on to put in the new GUID label which was the third command in the shot above. The numbers (409640, and 976101344) are taken from the line that has index 2 on it above. You MUST use the exact same numbers, otherwise you are going to change the partition size and may corrupt your data. The value after the -t is the GUID value for MacOS HFS (HFS+), which I found on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table</a>, you can also see that the one that was listed before I removed it was a Windows Basic Data Partition. </p>
<p>As soon as I hit enter on the gpt command to add it in, the gui disk utility immediately changed and now showed me my data was there. It also mounted the disk like nothing had happened.</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/disk2-backups.png" alt="" title="disk2-backups" width="763" height="713" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1272" /></p>
<p>I am going to wait till the copying is done and then do the other two drives and then I should be back to where I was before I installed Windows 7.</p>
<p>More info on the Apple GPT is at : <a href="http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/technotes/tn2006/tn2166.html">http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/technotes/tn2006/tn2166.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2010/02/13/windows-7-is-naughty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird Mac Problem</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/10/12/weird-mac-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/10/12/weird-mac-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reboot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shutdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has any one else seen this problem? Using a MacPro with Snow Leopard 10.6.1 on it, and it seems like everytime I go to shutdown the Mac (using Finder and holding Alt and clicking on shutdown) it shuts down, but then a second later it starts back up. (almost as if it was doing a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has any one else seen this problem? Using a MacPro with Snow Leopard 10.6.1 on it, and it seems like everytime I go to shutdown the Mac (using Finder and holding Alt and clicking on shutdown) it shuts down, but then a second later it starts back up. (almost as if it was doing a reboot instead of a shutdown. When the login screen shows up, I click the shutdown and it shuts down and doesn&#8217;t restart. Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/10/12/weird-mac-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone security patch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/09/16/iphone-security-patch/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/09/16/iphone-security-patch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CERT-US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that Apple finally released a patch for the iPhone about the security issue I wrote about back on May 1st (More Security Stuff) From Apple&#8217;s Web Site: WebKit CVE-ID: CVE-2009-2797 Available for: iPhone OS 1.0 through 3.0.1, iPhone OS for iPod touch 1.1 through 3.0 Impact: User names and passwords in URLs may [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Apple finally released a patch for the iPhone about the security issue I wrote about back on May 1st (<a href="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/05/01/more-security-stuff/">More Security Stuff</a>) </p>
<p>From Apple&#8217;s Web Site:</p>
<blockquote><p>WebKit</p>
<p>CVE-ID: CVE-2009-2797</p>
<p>Available for: iPhone OS 1.0 through 3.0.1, iPhone OS for iPod touch 1.1 through 3.0</p>
<p>Impact: User names and passwords in URLs may be disclosed to linked sites</p>
<p>Description: Safari includes the user name and password from the original URL in the referer header. This may lead to the disclosure of sensitive information. This update addresses the issue by not including user names and passwords in referer headers. Credit to James A. T. Rice of Jump Networks Ltd for reporting this issue.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not sure when James reported it though. So I don&#8217;t know if I found it before him or not. <strong>Anyways, here is my suggestion, if you use an iPhone and have EVER logged in to a web site with a username and password, you need to change that password immediately and then apply the patch from Apple to your iPhone. I know there are some people who view my site that use an iPhone and are clicking on links from other websites, therefore sending your username and password to me as well. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/09/16/iphone-security-patch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow Leopard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/08/29/snow-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/08/29/snow-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX 10.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received my copy of Snow Leopard today from Apple. They overnighted it and fedex was kind enough to call and tell me they tried to deliver it but was unable to. I stopped by the Fedex depot on the way home and picked it up. I decided to load it on the Laptop first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received my copy of Snow Leopard today from Apple. They overnighted it and fedex was kind enough to call and tell me they tried to deliver it but was unable to. I stopped by the Fedex depot on the way home and picked it up. I decided to load it on the Laptop first because I have heard of some problems with Adobe Photoshop Elements (which I run on the Mac Pro desktop). </p>
<p>So what are my thoughts:<br />
1. I think Apple shipped some faulty DVD&#8217;s. Everytime I put it in my MacBook Pro, it would try to read it and then it would eject it.  I put it in the MacPro desktop and it came right up. So back to the MBP and it continued to just eject it. I then attached an LG External USB DVD drive, and it seemed to have some problems reading it on there. I then did the Apple Software update (there were a couple of Security alerts available) thinking that may help. Didn&#8217;t appear to. Then all of the sudden it loaded the installer. After an hour later and 2 reboots Snow Leopard was installed via the USB drive. They still need to work on their installer, it set at the &#8220;Time Remaining : Less than a minute&#8221; for over 10 minutes. </p>
<p>2. The initial startup seemed to take some time, but have not tried rebooting it yet. </p>
<p>3. The Finder seems extremely faster. </p>
<p>4. It free&#8217;d up almost 10 gig of disk space for me. I started the install with only 17gb free. After the install I now have 27.11 gb free. </p>
<p>So far I havn&#8217;t tried any of the other apps I use, but Adium X 1.4b9 seems to run well. I also like the new Expose, seems to organize stuff a little better. Will have to see what else has changed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/08/29/snow-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sun Ray 5 Early Access part 2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/07/25/sun-ray-5-early-access-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/07/25/sun-ray-5-early-access-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Ray @Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacPro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Ray 5 Early Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally got time again to start playing with Sun Ray 5 Early Access software. Now my current setup probably should not be used for any type of test more than simple single/dual user testing. But I did not want to test the software on the current working server. So I decided to install it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got time again to start playing with Sun Ray 5 Early Access software. Now my current setup probably should not be used for any type of test more than simple single/dual user testing. But I did not want to test the software on the current working server. So I decided to install it in a VMWare image on my Mac Pro. The Mac Pro is more than suited to handle it and had plenty of free memory/processor/storage to use so there was no contention (I gave the VM 4 processors and 8 gig of ram)..</p>
<p>The kicker was getting VMWare Fusion to actually allocate the network cards the way I needed them. I gave the VM 2 nics (the Mac Pro has 2), however the only options that VMWare Fusion let you do is NAT, Host-Only, and Bridged. None of which will work if I want a private network for the Sun Ray&#8217;s. To fix this you will need to go and edit some files that VMWare Fusion uses. What I had to do was the following:</p>
<p>1. Open up the Terminal app<br />
2. Edit the file /Library/Application Support/VMware Fusion/boot.sh </p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;"><span class="kw2">sudo</span> vi /Library/Application\ Support/VMware\ Fusion/boot.<span class="kw2">sh</span></div>
</div>
<p>3. Comment out the following line:</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;"><span class="st0">&quot;$LIBDIR/vmnet-bridge&quot;</span> -d /var/run/vmnet-bridge-vmnet0.pid vmnet0 <span class="st0">&#8221;</span></div>
</div>
<p>And then add 2 lines directly below that line, which tells vmware to bind the en0 physical device to the vmnet0 virtual device, same for en1 to vmnet2. Note you can not use vmnet1 or vmnet8 as those are for NAT and Host-only connections.</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;"><span class="st0">&quot;$LIBDIR/vmnet-bridge&quot;</span> -d /var/run/vmnet-bridge-vmnet0.pid vmnet0 en0<br />
<span class="st0">&quot;$LIBDIR/vmnet-bridge&quot;</span> -d /var/run/vmnet-bridge-vmnet2.pid vmnet2 en1</div>
</div>
<p>Once done, do the following:</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;"><span class="kw2">sudo</span> /Library/Application\ Support/VMware\ Fusion/boot.<span class="kw2">sh</span> &#8211;restart</div>
</div>
<p>Now go in to your Mac System Preferences and configure the second network card for a private subnet (i.e. 192.168.128.0/24, and set the IP to be something like 192.168.128.254). </p>
<p>Now make sure that your VM is NOT started and is in a powered off state. Go in to the VM and under the settings for that VM add another network adapter, make sure it is selected as &#8220;Connected&#8221; it doesn&#8217;t matter what the device is configured to as we will change it later to an option that is not shown in that list.</p>
<p>Now you need to change the .VMX file so that it can use the new network device. So go in to the directory where you have your VM&#8217;s at and then cd in to the machine.vmwarevm directory (For example mine is called SolarisDev.vmwarevm)</p>
<p>Once in there you will need to edit the vmx file, mine is called SolarisDev.vmx. The first thing we are going to change is the ethernet0.connectionType property. Right now it could be any of the ones listed (host-only,bridged, nat). But we are going to change this to &#8220;custom&#8221;:</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;">ethernet0.<span class="re2">connectionType=</span><span class="st0">&quot;custom&quot;</span></div>
</div>
<p>Next find the entry for ethernet0.vnet, if it doesn&#8217;t exist create it and make it look like the line below. If it does exist and doesn&#8217;t match that below, make it match that:</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;">ethernet0.vnet = <span class="st0">&quot;vmnet0&quot;</span></div>
</div>
<p>Now we need to do the same for the ethernet1 entries. The only difference to what is above is vmnet0 changes to vmnet2. Once the changes are made you can save the file and start up your Solaris VM. Now what ever network is on your en0 connection on your Mac should be what is connected to the e1000g0 network on the Solaris side. I used the e1000g0 as the &#8220;public&#8221; side of the Sun Ray server. The e1000g1 interface will be what ever is connected on the en1 connection on the Mac side. I used this adapter for the private Sun Ray Lan.</p>
<p>You should be able to finish following the instructions on the Sun Ray wiki now and get everything configured. </p>
<p>To test the soft client, I set up LAN Connections on the Sun Ray Server:</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;">/opt/SUNWut/sbin/utadm -L on</div>
</div>
<p>I then installed the soft client in another VM on the same machine that only had access to the public network. You then can tell the soft client what the IP of the Sun Ray server is and it will connect. Pretty darn cool that the soft client works with minimal config.</p>
<p>This can probably be done on a MacBook Pro as well, if you use the wireless connection as the public side and the wired as the private side. Nice way to do a little demo in one computer.</p>
<p>For reference here is what my network section of the .vmx file looks like :</p>
<div class="codesnip-container" >
<div class="codesnip" style="font-family: monospace;">ethernet0.addressType = <span class="st0">&quot;generated&quot;</span><br />
ethernet0.connectionType = <span class="st0">&quot;custom&quot;</span><br />
ethernet0.generatedAddress = <span class="st0">&quot;00:0c:29:f8:29:3b&quot;</span><br />
ethernet0.generatedAddressOffset = <span class="st0">&quot;0&quot;</span><br />
ethernet0.linkStatePropagation.<span class="kw3">enable</span> = <span class="st0">&quot;TRUE&quot;</span><br />
ethernet0.pciSlotNumber = <span class="st0">&quot;32&quot;</span><br />
ethernet0.present = <span class="st0">&quot;TRUE&quot;</span><br />
ethernet0.virtualDev = <span class="st0">&quot;e1000&quot;</span><br />
ethernet0.vnet = <span class="st0">&quot;vmnet0&quot;</span><br />
ethernet0.wakeOnPcktRcv = <span class="st0">&quot;FALSE&quot;</span><br />
ethernet1.addressType = <span class="st0">&quot;generated&quot;</span><br />
ethernet1.connectionType = <span class="st0">&quot;custom&quot;</span><br />
ethernet1.generatedAddress = <span class="st0">&quot;00:0c:29:f8:29:45&quot;</span><br />
ethernet1.generatedAddressOffset = <span class="st0">&quot;10&quot;</span><br />
ethernet1.linkStatePropagation.<span class="kw3">enable</span> = <span class="st0">&quot;TRUE&quot;</span><br />
ethernet1.pciSlotNumber = <span class="st0">&quot;35&quot;</span><br />
ethernet1.present = <span class="st0">&quot;TRUE&quot;</span><br />
ethernet1.virtualDev = <span class="st0">&quot;e1000&quot;</span><br />
ethernet1.vnet = <span class="st0">&quot;vmnet2&quot;</span><br />
ethernet1.wakeOnPcktRcv = <span class="st0">&quot;FALSE&quot;</span></div>
</div>
<p>References:<br />
Sun Ray Software 4.2 Wiki:<a href="http://wikis.sun.com/display/SRSS4dot2/Home"> http://wikis.sun.com/display/SRSS4dot2/Home</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/07/25/sun-ray-5-early-access-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The PC Tax</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/04/16/the-pc-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/04/16/the-pc-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M$ Winders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIndows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading this PDF about the Apple Tax, I  find it interesting that they do not include anything about the PC Tax&#8230;.. So here is my take on the stuff that is missing: 1. OS Upgrades for a multiple PC house vs a multiple MAC House. Most households probably have more than one PC/Mac in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading this PDF about the <a href="http://www.ndpta.com/files/AppleTax.pdf">Apple Tax</a>, I  find it interesting that they do not include anything about the PC Tax&#8230;..</p>
<p>So here is my take on the stuff that is missing:</p>
<p>1. OS Upgrades for a multiple PC house vs a multiple MAC House. Most households probably have more than one PC/Mac in the house now days. So when a new OS comes out, how much does it take to &#8220;upgrade&#8221; the house.. Looking at the current price of Microsoft Vista Home Premimum, it is $115.99 for the Upgrade edition. MacOSX Leopard is currently $129.00. So for one computer, yes MacOS is a little more expensive, but lets look at if you have 4 computers in the house. To upgrade your 4 PC&#8217;s to Vista, you are going to pay $463.96. If you have 4 Mac&#8217;s, to upgrade them to MacOS X Leopard, $199.00.. Yes that is correct it costs you $264.96 more to upgrade 4 PC&#8217;s than it does to upgrade 4 Mac&#8217;s. This is because Apple offers a &#8220;family pack&#8221; pricing, which allows you to install the software on up to 5 Mac&#8217;s in the same household. Microsoft does not do this.</p>
<p>2. Office Software. If all you need is basic Word processing and spread sheet&#8217;s, iWork from Apple does everything you would need. Once again a single upgrade would cost $79, and they offer a family pack too, for $99 you can upgrade 5 Mac&#8217;s. Now look at Microsoft Office Home and Student it is $94.45 per computer. So for 4 PC&#8217;s, we are up to $377.80 now vs the $99 for iWork on the Mac. Difference of $278.80.</p>
<p>3. Virus protection. For the most part (read as 99%) Mac&#8217;s are free of Virus&#8217;. So there is no &#8220;software&#8221; needed on them. But on PC&#8217;s you better not even connect it to the Interwebs with out having a virus protection software on the machine. So If we look at the sort of &#8220;defacto&#8221; Norton Antivirus, it costs $39.99 a YEAR per PC. So for our 4 PC&#8217;s it would be $159.96 a YEAR, whereas our Mac is $0.</p>
<p>If we add all this up as if Vista and Office just came out, our cost for upgrading a house of 4 PC&#8217;s would be $1,001.72.. Versus if we were to upgrade a house of 4 Mac&#8217;s to the newest MacOSX and iWork, it would cost $298.00. For a difference of $703.72. So a having a house of Mac&#8217;s is about 70% cheaper to upgrade than a house of PC&#8217;s is.</p>
<p>One section of the article is just plain wrong:</p>
<blockquote><p>Finally, there is a category of costs that could be called opportunity costs, options that are simply not<br />
available in the Apple world.  These options include cutting edge technologies that buyers really want<br />
including HDMI (for connecting a PC to a TV for viewing high-definition content), the aforementioned<br />
Blu-Ray, eSATA (for fast access to external storage), media card readers (for interoperation with other<br />
digital devices like cameras), built-in 3G wireless (to stay connected anywhere cell service is live),<br />
fingerprint readers (to easily access secure data), and TV Tuners (to watch and record broadcast<br />
content).  These technologies, revolutionary now, will one day be standard on all systems.  Too bad if<br />
a Mac buyer has any interest in them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Has the person never heard of USB media card readers? They are UNIVERSAL&#8230; I have a couple of them, work great with the Mac. I also have an <a href="http://elgato.com/elgato/na/mainmenu/products/hybrid09/product1.en.html">Elgato USB TV Tuner</a> that does HDTV, clear QAM and allows my Mac to record shows. There is no reason  you couldn&#8217;t put a Blu-Ray reader in a Mac Pro, or even get a USB enclosure for it. Just because some PC&#8217;s come with all this stuff built in, unless you are going to user it, does it really matter if it is there. Heck I have a new printer that has one of the Media Card readers in it, so when it is connected via USB to the Mac it looks like any other removable media device.</p>
<p>The final part of the article that sort of is ridiculous, is the author assumes that to do wireless on a Mac you need an Airport Extreme. Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is a reason it is called 802.11[abng] it is a standard that EVERYONE uses. You don&#8217;t need to have a specific brand unless you really want to be brand loyal or don&#8217;t know any better. I have a $40 Linksys wireless router that works 100% fine with the Mac&#8217;s I use. He also talks about the $100 cost for the family pack of the iLife software. I have 3 versions of this, and it is worth the money. Microsoft has NO comparable software offering for that price with the functionality that iLife provides. Even if they did, they would not be selling 5 licenses for $100. It would probably be $50 to $80 per license.</p>
<p>The other issue that he brings up is that most software that works on Windows XP will work on Vista, but people who switch from PC to Mac will have to buy all new software. This is not entirly true. You can use Windows XP/Vista on Mac Hardware either via BootCamp or VMWare Fusion/Parallels Desktop. I do this for a couple of applications that I need that are only available on Windows. But for the most part I have found that everything I need for my day to day computing on the Mac is free software. There are only a couple of programs I have bought because I needed functionality that the provided.. But for the most part there are equivalent Mac programs for every Windows one, and most of the time they are better and some times Free.</p>
<p>I think the next time before some one tries to say how much more Mac&#8217;s cost they need to really do their home work. Yes the hardware costs more up front, but in the long run, it last longer, runs better and has less problems. I used to have a Dual G4 for a desktop. It used dual 533Mhz processors and ran MacOSX Tiger just fine. Try running Vista on a Pentium III and we will talk.. Windows is getting better about the bloat, but they still have a LONG way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/04/16/the-pc-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>memory in mac pro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/04/02/memory-in-mac-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/04/02/memory-in-mac-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a difference more memory makes in the mac pro&#8230;&#8230;. Before: After: Pretty darn snappy now, and vmware does not page as much when doing things in &#8220;windows&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a difference more memory makes in the mac pro&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Before:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1076" title="before" src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-11.png" alt="before" width="311" height="379" /></p>
<p>After:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1077" title="after" src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-12.png" alt="after" width="306" height="379" /></p>
<p>Pretty darn snappy now, and vmware does not page as much when doing things in &#8220;windows&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/04/02/memory-in-mac-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AIX Most secure OS? Think not.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/02/15/aix-most-secure-os-think-not/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/02/15/aix-most-secure-os-think-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM&#8217;s Xforce published their new 2008 annual report. In it they had this chart: Surprising is that IBM put&#8217;s one of their own OS&#8217;s near the bottom of the list. Some of my opinions are : 1. No one uses AIX that much, so no one looks for holes in the code. 2. Any one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM&#8217;s Xforce published their new 2008 annual report.  In it they had this chart:<br />
<img src="http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/xforce2008.png" alt="xforce2008" title="xforce2008" width="515" height="690" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1062" /></p>
<p>Surprising is that IBM put&#8217;s one of their own OS&#8217;s near the bottom of the list. Some of my opinions are :</p>
<p>1. No one uses AIX that much, so no one looks for holes in the code.<br />
2. Any one who uses AIX, doesn&#8217;t have it directly connected to the Internet.<br />
3. It is so cost prohibitive to use, that people are looking at Solaris/Linux or Windows to run their business on.</p>
<p>But the funniest thing about this is the last I used AIX the following were still done on install by IBM:<br />
1. telnet enabled<br />
2. root logins allowed remotely<br />
3. no ssh comes with the OS, you have to install a crappy &#8220;linux toolkit&#8221;, and then install another 10 different packages to get SSH enabled.<br />
4. No RBAC<br />
5. Syslog configuration does not exist<br />
6. Root does not even have a password on install</p>
<p>Seems to me that IBM needs to fix some fundamental issues with their OWN OS before they can say it is not one of the &#8220;Most Vulnerable Operating Systems&#8221;.</p>
<p>The funniest issue with this is for MacOSX to be listed at the top, all most all of those require some one to actually run something on the machine with administrative privileges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2009/02/15/aix-most-secure-os-think-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Buy suckering people</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/02/02/best-buy-suckering-people/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/02/02/best-buy-suckering-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 00:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/02/02/best-buy-suckering-people/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to Best Buy today to walk around and get out of the house. While I was there I walked past their little Mac section of the store. There was a man there looking and playing with a MacBook Pro. A Best Buy person came over and asked him if he needed any help. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to Best Buy today to walk around and get out of the house. While I was there I walked past their little Mac section of the store. There was a man there looking and playing with a MacBook Pro. A Best Buy person came over and asked him if he needed any help. So the man proceeded to ask the Best Buy person how he would transfer his files from his PC to the Mac if he bought it. What I heard next just made me mad&#8230; She told him that in order to transfer the files to the new Mac he would need some expensive software or he could bring the PC in to Best Buy and they would transfer all his files over for a charge. Why is it stores like this try to get any amount of money they can out of people who are computer un-savy? </p>
<p>People it is really easy to move stuff between PC and Mac. Apple even has a small <a href="http://www.apple.com/findouthow/macosx/#basics-move">2:30 minute video</a> on how to do it.. Don&#8217;t let the Big Box stores charge you for something that is easy and any one can do it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2008/02/02/best-buy-suckering-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Care worth the extra expense</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/12/21/apple-care-worth-the-extra-expense/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/12/21/apple-care-worth-the-extra-expense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unixwiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/12/21/apple-care-worth-the-extra-expense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I bought my MacBook Pro I opted to get the Apple Care Extended warranty. I am so glad I did now. Since I have had my MBP, I have had 3 different batteries and now tonight I called to get a new power adapter, as the cord where the magsafe adapter is is starting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I bought my MacBook Pro I opted to get the Apple Care Extended warranty. I am so glad I did now. Since I have had my MBP, I have had 3 different batteries and now tonight I called to get a new power adapter, as the cord where the magsafe adapter is is starting to come out of the boot. So I called tonight and talked to Steve, who was having problems with his machine, but once I told him what I needed he said &#8220;If you have enough battery, disconnect the power cable now. It may spark and cause a fire.&#8221; It has not gotten that loose yet, but it needed replaced. If you did not have Apple Care, it would cost you $79.00 + TAX to get a new one. All told the amount I would have spent on replacement parts would be over $400.</p>
<p>So my recommendation, if you are going to buy a Apple, get the AppleCare along with it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.sungeek.net/unixwiz/2007/12/21/apple-care-worth-the-extra-expense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
